点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
河南平顶山一皮具厂非法处置危险废物 21人被追责问责******
中新网2月3日电 据“清风平顶山”微信公众号消息，河南省平顶山市纪委监委3日发布关于鲁山县张良镇宇航皮具厂非法处置危险废物案件追责问责情况的通报。通报表示，平顶山市纪委监委深入调查关于张良镇宇航皮具厂非法处置铝灰渣等危险废物问题，共追责问责21人。
2021年4月23日，中央第五生态环境保护督导组移交鲁山县环保局职工王炳方等人非法生产并处置铝灰渣问题线索后，平顶山市纪委监委高度重视，立即成立市县两级调查组，依规依纪依法进行了深入调查，并对存在环境监管失职失责问题的相关人员进行了严肃追责问责。现通报如下：
一、关于张良镇宇航皮具厂非法处置铝灰渣等危险废物问题
经查，2019年6月，原鲁山县环保局职工王炳方为非法牟利，伙同张良镇张南村村民冯延伟等人，从事铝灰渣加工回收金属铝业务，并将产生的废铝灰掩埋在冯延伟经营的宇航皮具厂内及该厂北侧500米的土地内。经河南省生态环境科学研究所鉴定，该厂加工、处置的铝灰原料和倾倒物均属于“危险废物”，该掩埋点共非法占用耕地4.5亩，其中基本农田1亩，现场共清理废物、废铝灰16819吨，由此形成的环境损害赔偿金额为3868万余元、土壤和地下水生态环境损害金额78万余元。平顶山市生态环境局鲁山分局(原鲁山县环保局)、鲁山县张良镇人民政府、鲁山县自然资源局相关人员对生态环境保护工作重视不够，执法不严，履职不力，在环境监管、耕地保护等工作中存在失职失责问题。
二、有关责任人员处理情况
本案共追责问责21人，其中移送司法机关判处刑罚4人，开除党籍4人，开除公职4人，政务撤职2人，调离环保工作岗位3人。
王炳方，平顶山市生态环境局鲁山分局原职工，违反国家法律法规，被给予开除公职处分；犯污染环境罪，被司法机关判处有期徒刑六年。
李庆涛，平顶山市生态环境局鲁山分局环境监察大队一中队(张良中队)原中队长，违反政治纪律，违反中央八项规定精神，违反国家法律法规，被给予开除党籍、开除公职处分；犯环境监管失职罪，被司法机关判处有期徒刑一年六个月，缓刑二年。
李苏南，平顶山市生态环境局鲁山分局环境监察大队一中队(张良中队)原副中队长，违反政治纪律，违反中央八项规定精神，违反国家法律法规，被给予开除党籍、开除公职处分；犯环境监管失职罪，被司法机关判处有期徒刑一年二个月，缓刑一年六个月。
陶林超，平顶山市生态环境局鲁山分局环境监察大队一中队(张良中队)原工作人员，严重职务违法，被给予开除公职处分；犯环境监管失职罪，被司法机关判处有期徒刑八个月，缓刑一年。
刘广跃，鲁山县张良镇环保所原所长，违反工作纪律，被给予开除党籍、政务撤职处分，调离环保工作岗位。
安华延，鲁山县张良镇环保所原副所长，违反工作纪律，被给予开除党籍、政务撤职处分，调离环保工作岗位。
另对负有领导责任的鲁山县自然资源局党组原副书记(主持全面工作)陈新兴等5人，违反工作纪律的平顶山市生态环境局鲁山分局环境监察大队大队长李永军等7人，违反工作要求的鲁山县张良镇国土资源所原负责人孙自合等3人，分别给予党纪政务处分或组织处理。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
1分快3地图 |
)